34,561 results

Integrating fishing industry knowledge of fishing grounds with scientific data on seabed habitats for informed spatial management and ESD evaluation in the SEF

Project number: 2000-153
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $311,673.00
Principal Investigator: Alan Williams
Organisation: CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere Hobart
Project start/end date: 29 Dec 2000 - 29 Jun 2007
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The SEF fishing industry, particularly the trawl sector, has a need to be proactive in the face of growing community attention to trawling based on its potential to modify benthic habitat and threaten biodiversity values. This need is focussed by the timetable for the regional marine planning process (the end of 2001 for the SEF region), as well as to meet provisions under Schedule 4 of the Wildlife Protection (Regulation of Experts and Imports) Act and the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act. Without solid information or a developed industry position regarding the spatial management of its fishing grounds, the fishing industry will have minimal ability to engage in this process as active partners.

The SEF fishing industry holds strong beliefs about the importance of particular seabed habitats for is continued profitability (Prince, Baelde and Wright FRDC 71/114) and has a need to develop a mature relationship with the National Ocean's Office and Environment Australia. This relationship and the information formailsed by this project will enable the industry to have input in the near-term to the Regional Marine Planning process and to certify their seafood products for expertation under the Wildlife Protection Act.

The outcomes of this project will have direct relevance t:
advancing AFMA's legislated aims of sustaining biological production and economic efficiency
seeking certification for inclusion on Schedule 4 of the Wildlife protection Act
attaining ESD accreditation in the longer term
responding to the near term needs of participating in the process of developing Environment Australia's South East Regional Marine Plan.

The finely detailed and annotated maps to be generated by this project will provide a template on which the distribution of fishing effort and catches can be plotted, and will form the basis of industry proposals to introduce a spatial management to their fishery. Without these maps and the process supported by this project there is a risk that uninformed spatial management of fishing effort would contribute neither to conservation goals nor the fishing industry and could be to the detriment of both. Moreover, inappropriate spatial management would be counter-productive to ESD planning for the SEF.

Objectives

1. Proactively and cooperativley develop industry policy in response to the requirements of the Wildlife Protection Act (especially principle 2). 1.1 Acquire, collate and map industry (trawl and non-trawl) information on the spatial extent use of fishing grounds in the SEF.1.2 Evaluate and summarise this information in relation to the Wildlife Protection Act (especially principle 2) guidelines.
2. Integrate fishing industry knowledge and scientific data to give quality assured information on linkages between seabed habitats, biodiversity and fishery production for informed sustainable management of the SEF and to build broad understanding.2.1 Develop deployment equipment to provide an ongoing capacity to photographically monitor habitats from industry vessels.2.2 Validate and complement industry information gathered for objective 1 by ground-truth sampling from industry vessels.2.3 Consolidate all the information from this project, together with existing ecological and physical (geographical, topographical and hydrological) data, and provide a draft paper for industry that addresses relevant elements (primarily Principle 2 of the Wildlife Protection Act guidelines).2.4 Support, through a series of workshops, the development by industry of spatial management options to protect biodiversity and fishery production in the SEF based on the information provided through this project.2.5 Develop a Public Relations strategy for the project and its outcomes, including media release kits/releases and supporting video/photographic images, collaboratively between SETFIA, SENTA and the project team.

Control of Perkinsus disease in abalone

Project number: 2000-151
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $247,749.00
Principal Investigator: Bob J. Lester
Organisation: University of Queensland (UQ)
Project start/end date: 5 Sep 2000 - 10 May 2006
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Disease, particularly Perkinsus disease, is seen as the fourth major risk to the sustainability of the abalone fishery in SA (SA Fisheries & Aquaculture Five Year Research and Development Strategy). Perkinsus disease causes ongoing losses to the industry, losses that are expected to increase with global warming unless some action is taken to curb the disease. This project will explore one approach that may be feasible to control Perkinsus and thus reduce its impact on the industry.

A recent project in California (Culver and Kuris, in press) successfully eradicated a species of mudworm from abalone by removal of the most susceptible shell (N. Bax, CSIRO, pers. com.)

Objectives

1. To determine the extent and nature of Perkinsus infection around Taylor Island, identification of possible reservoir hosts, the production of an epidemiological model, and recommendations on appropriate management methods.

Final report

AAHL Fish Diseases Laboratory bacteriology workshop

Project number: 2000-149
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $35,604.99
Principal Investigator: Nick Gudkovs
Organisation: CSIRO Australian Animal Health Laboratory
Project start/end date: 18 Dec 2000 - 30 Dec 2001
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Diagnostic laboratories across the country vary in their diagnostic capability for aquatic animal pathogens. Due to their individual needs, many diagnostic laboratories have developed their own reagents and procedures for the identification of bacterial pathogens. This lack of standardisation can be problematical, for example, when reporting on aquatic animal health status. Using Vibrio identification as an example, it is likely that diagnostic laboratories would be capable of identification to the genus level (i.e. Vibrio sp.). However, due to differences in the various laboratories, identification to the species level would be difficult, and different laboratories are likely to use different procedures for identification.

There is a clear need for diagnostic scientists working in this area to compare and standardise protocols between States. A series of workshops aimed at providing training in the diagnosis of bacterial disease in aquatic animals for those new to the area, and at the same time providing an opportunity to evaluate the various diagnostic protocols used in Australia for their ability to identify both enzootic and exotic pathogens is overdue.

Development of Standard Diagnostic Techniques will require three logical steps:

1. Comparison and evaluation of the tests currently used by diagnostic laboratories;
2. Development of, and agreement on, the most sensitive, accurate and reproducible methods;
3. Adoption and publication of the agreed method for each pathogen as the Standard Diagnostic Technique.

Thus development of SDTs in aquatic animal bacteriology may include an SDT on general methods for aquatic animal bacteriology followed by SDTs for specific diseases such as Vibriosis. Vibriosis, due to its widespread occurence in vertebrate and invertebrate aquatic animal species in tropical and temperate regions of Australia, was identified as a disease of particular importance with respect to standardisation of diagnostic methods [1].

In order to ensure that the SDTs incorporate the latest technologies and information on exotic, as well as enzootic, bacterial pathogens, and that the SDTs will be recognised internationally as state-of-the-art, an international expert on the specific disease will be invited to participate in each of the respective workshops.

References

1. Fish Health Management Committee (1998). Report of the Fish Health Management Committee and the Fish Health Coordinating Group: Workshop on Aquatic Animal Health: Technical Issues, 7-9 December 1998, Melbourne, Victoria.

Objectives

1. Introductory Workshop in Fish Bacteriology - to provide training in basic diagnostic techniques for the major diseases of salmonids and other finfish.
2. Bacteriology Workshop - Diagnosis of Vibriosis in aquatic animals.
3. Preparation and submission of a report recommending bacteriological methods for aquatic animals for inclusion in Australian Standard Diagnostic Techniques (SDTs), and agreement on authorship, provided to the Aquatic Animal Health Unit, National Office of Animal and Plant Health.

Final report

ESD and fisheries: what, why, how and when? A stakeholders' workshop

Project number: 2000-147
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $57,927.49
Principal Investigator: Ross J. Hodge
Organisation: Seafood Industry Victoria Inc (SIV)
Project start/end date: 12 Mar 2000 - 22 Mar 2002
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The Research Subcommittee of the Standing Committee for Fisheries and Aquaculture (SCFA) has been developing a national approach to the implementation of Ecologically Sustainable Development (ESD) in fisheries. Recently, Environment Australia (EA) has proposed changes to Schedule 4 of the Wildlife Protection Act in which the general exemption of commercial fish species from Schedule 4 be removed. It will be a requirement that "species are taken in a manner that is demonstrably ecologically sustainable" before being given an exemption from the Act. EA has developed a draft set of criteria for assessing sustainability of commercial fisheries. SCFA has formed a Sustainability Indicators Working Group to coordinate a national response. The Research Subcommittee presented a workplan for developing sustainability indicators to this Group on October 15. This was endorsed by SCFA on 26 October 1999.

These national initiatives should also been seen within the context of international developments such as FAO's 'Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries'and 'Guidelines for Developing Indicators for Sustainable Development for Wild Capture Fisheries', the Marine Stewardship Council's (MSC) 'Principles and Criteria for Sustainable Fishing' and ISO 14000. A number of Australian fisheries have expressed interest in obtaining MSC accreditation.

The interaction of fisheries and the environment including increased scrutiny of the industry by environment groups, MSC and Schedule 4, was one of the main themes at the recent Seafood Directions Conference.

Its against this background of major developments by a range of agencies, both national and international, that this workshop is proposed. To effectively implement ESD in fisheries will require a partnership between all stakeholders. The proposed workshop is endorsed by SCFA. It is consistent with the workplan developed by the Research Subcommittee. It is the first step to ensuring all participants are aware of all the issues, speak the same language and take ownership of the process. The workshop will identify stakeholder priorities and proved the basis for an action plan addressing these priorities.

The workshop will replace an FRDC-sponsored workshop which was scheduled to be held during 1999. It will be held in conjunction with the International Seafood Fair to be held at Geelong in March 2000.

Objectives

1. To hold a workshop to ensure all stakeholders are aware of the issues and processes surrounding ESD and fisheries.
2. To identify SCFA, industry and other stakeholder priorities.
3. To provide the basis for an action plan for addressing stakeholder priorities.

Final report

ISBN: 0-9579124-1-2
Author: Ross Hodge David C Smith
Final Report • 2002-02-28 • 949.43 KB
2000-147-DLD.pdf

Summary

ESD has become a major objective of the fisheries legislation of most jurisdictions. A key component is the need to measure and report performance against ESD objectives. Setting sustainable levels of fishing has, of course, been central to fisheries management and science for a long time. The concept of ESD, however, is far broader than the traditional focus on yields derived from target species. ESD attempts to balance the environmental, economic and social aspects of fisheries.

In 1998, Standing Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture (SCFA) charged its Research Subcommittee with the task of developing guidelines for assessing fisheries against ESD objectives. In 1999, Environment Australia (EA) proposed changes to Schedule 4 of the Wildlife Protection Act. It was proposed that the general exemption of commercial fish species from Schedule 4 be removed. It will be a requirement that "species are taken in a manner that is demonstrably ecologically sustainable" before being given an exemption from the Act. EA has developed a set of criteria for assessing the sustainability of commercial fisheries. SCP A formed a Sustainability Indicators Working Group to coordinate a national response.

These national initiatives should also been seen within the context of international developments such as the FAO's 'Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries' and 'Guidelines for Developing Indicators of Sustainable Development for Wild Capture Fisheries', the Marine Stewardship Council's (MSC) 'Principles and Criteria for Sustainable Fishing' and ISO 14000.

It was against this background of major developments by a range of agencies, both national and international, that this workshop was held. The initial idea was for a small workshop to be held in conjunction with Geelong's Seafood Fair. However, the concept developed rapidly following SCP A support and substantial funding from FRDC.

The workshop program involved leading representatives from the commercial and recreational sector, conservation groups, science and government. It was attended by almost 200 delegates. The workshop presented a timely opportunity to ensure that all participants were aware of the issues, spoke the same language and took ownership of the process.

Many people contributed to the organisation of the workshop including Lyn Warn, Richard McLoughlin, Kelly Roffey, Diane Mahon and Peter Dundas-Smith. In addition, Diane Mahon was the text editor for these proceedings.

Project products

Proceedings • 3.91 MB
2000-147-Proceedings.pdf

Summary

ESD has become a major objective of the fisheries legislation of most jurisdictions. A key component is the need to measure and report performance against ESD objectives. Setting sustainable levels of fishing has, of course, been central to fisheries management and science for a long time. The concept of ESD, however, is far broader than the traditional focus on yields derived from target species. ESD attempts to balance the environmental, economic and social aspects of fisheries.

In 1998, Standing Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture (SCF A) charged its Research Subcommittee with the task of developing guidelines for assessing fisheries against ESD objectives. In 1999, Environment Australia (EA) proposed changes to Schedule 4 of the Wildlife Protection Act. It was proposed that the general exemption of commercial fish species from Schedule 4 be removed. It will be a requirement that "species are taken in a manner that is demonstrably ecologically sustainable" before being given an exemption from the Act. EA has developed a set of criteria for assessing the sustainability of commercial fisheries. SCF A formed a Sustainability Indicators Working Group to coordinate a national response.

These national initiatives should also been seen within the context of international developments such as the F AO's 'Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries' and 'Guidelines for Developing Indicators of Sustainable Development for Wild Capture Fisheries', the Marine Stewardship Council's (MSC) 'Principles and Criteria for Sustainable Fishing' and ISO 14000.

It was against this background of major developments by a range of agencies, both national and international, that this workshop was held. The initial idea was for a small workshop to be held in conjunction with Geelong's Seafood Fair. However, the concept developed rapidly following SCF A support and substantial funding from FRDC.

The workshop program involved leading representatives from the commercial and recreational sector, conservation groups, science and government. It was attended by almost 200 delegates. The workshop presented a timely opportunity to ensure that all participants were aware of the issues, spoke the same language and took ownership of the process.

Many people contributed to the organisation of the workshop including Lyn Warn, Richard McLoughlin, Kelly Roffey, Diane Mahon and Peter Dundas-Smith. In addition, Diane Mahon was the text editor for these proceedings.

Developing environmental management standards for the Australian seafood industry

Project number: 2000-146
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $229,841.00
Principal Investigator: Phil March
Organisation: OceanWatch Australia Ltd
Project start/end date: 29 Jun 2000 - 27 May 2005
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The seafood industry is acutely aware that the community has become increasingly sceptical about assurances from industry and government regarding the state of the environment generally and in particular the environmental performance of industries which interact with the natural environment.

Development of nationally and internationally recognised environmental management standards using the SeaQual Australia process will assist to:
. achieve significant cultural change within the fishing and associated industries;
. focus the industry clearly on continuous improvement of its environmental performance; and
. gain international and domestic recognition that the industry is operating within environmental standards appropriate for the marine environment.

This project is an opportunity for governments and industry to lead the way internationally with the development and implementation of fisheries environmental standards which will engender public confidence in the way fisheries and the marine environment generally are being managed and that fisheries resources are being used sustainably.

To achieve this there is an urgent need to develop an environmental management system framework which provides realistic and achievable options for environmental accreditation/certification for each of the diverse range of fisheries in Australia. Such a framework needs to be also supported by access to tools and expertise to assist each fishery to determine appropriate environmental management systems for that fishery and to help the fishery to commence the journey of continued improvement in environmental performance (See Attachment 1).

This project will build on initiatives such as Greening Australia's Fisheries, SeaNet and SeaQual Australia to ensure that research outcomes relating to environmental performance are adopted by industry within an appropriate context.

Working together, SeaQual Australia, operating as part of Seafood Services Australia, will provide resources and guidance in the development of a "green chooser" and other products (including environmental management standards development) while SeaNet will provide the all important face-to-face assistance with using such products and with ensuring that their development is soundly based on industry needs.

Building on the work being undertaken by SCFA in relation to Fisheries ESD indicators, this project will commence the development of environmental management standards which can be assessed by independent 3rd party auditors.

While this project has been identified under the industry development program of FRDC it is extremely relevant to the other two FRDC programs eg achieving resource sustainability through fisheries management improvement. Continued improvement of the industry's environmental performance will be key outcomes of the project. This project is also targeted to address State priorities identified by the State FRABs. In all cases improving environmental performance is a high priority. The priorities identified by the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture will also be addressed.

This project provides a unique opportunity to ensure that research results and outcomes are adopted and implemented to the satisfaction of all stakeholders. By working closely with the SCFA ESD reference group, the development of ESD indicators (SCFA project) and the tools required to assist industry stakeholders to meet them (this project) can occur in a systematic pragmatic way and assist in achievement of the desired outcomes.

Objectives

1. To provide a framework and support to enable fisheries in Australia to determine and achieve an appropriate level of environmental accreditation/certification through implementation of an environmental management system relevant to each fishery underpinned by a commitment to continuous improvement.
2. Expand the capacity for SeaNet to provide expertise and assistance to industry groups in improving their management practices and in positioning themselves to implement appropriate environmental management systems and standards for their fisheries.
3. To develop a support tool to guide decisions on appropriate environmental management systems ie "a SeaQual green chooser".
4. To develop nationally and internationally recognised prerequisites for environmental management standards adopted by fisheries throughout Australia.
5. To identify, document and disseminate environmental best practice technologies and techniques to fisheries.

Report

ISBN: 0 9775587 5 4
Report • 644.80 KB
Seafood EMS - Recipes for Success.pdf

Summary

The purpose of this report is to illustrate the value of EMS as a management tool for seafood businesses to achieve their environmental, economic and social goals and in achieving broader natural resources management goals associated with fishing and aquaculture as well as demonstrating to the community the seafood industry’s environmental credentials.

The report targets existing and potential industry leaders, facilitators and training providers and government officials who have a desire to be involved in the continued development of the seafood industry through EMS.

Project products

Manual • 3.17 MB
Seafood EMS - Self-assessment and Training Manual.pdf

Summary

This Seafood EMS Self-assessment and Training Manual, including the Seafood EMS worksheets, its companion, the Seafood EMS Assessor’s Guide, the Seafood EMS Communication Kit and the Seafood EMS CD provide the seafood industry with a national program for EMS training and assessment.

This manual helps you through the development and implementation of an EMS that meets the needs of your seafood business.

Case study • 1.78 MB
Seafood EMS - Walking the Talk - Seafood EMS Case Studies.pdf

Summary

Seafood Services Australia Ltd is proud to bring you, in this publication and others in the series of Seafood EMS Resources, the distilled wisdom of the industry leaders who have pioneered seafood environmental management systems in Australia.

The Seafood EMS Resources result from an intensive R&D program made possible by the Australian Government’s investment of $1.65 million of Natural Heritage Trust funds through industry partnership programs, including the EMS National Pilot and Pathways to Industry EMS programs. The seafood industry invested $3 million in-kind in these latter two programs.

This R&D capitalised on the innovative strategic investments in environmental management systems in the seafood industry by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, with strong support from the Australian seafood industry.

The industry has earned a leading reputation around the world and among other primary industries for these ground-breaking initiatives and its enthusiastic uptake of seafood EMS. By using the Seafood EMS Resources, you’re taking advantage of the best EMS experience currently available.

Guide • 1.32 MB
Seafood EMS - Assessor's Guide.pdf

Summary

Environmental sustainability is a high priority for the Australian seafood industry and the Australian Government. It can only be achieved through the collaborative efforts of everyone involved in the industry. 

Seafood Services EMS initiatives have been made possible by the Fisheries Development Corporation’s investment in the development and extension of the Seafood EMS model in SSA itself. The guide has been developed under the EMS Pathways for the Seafood Industry project1 funded by the Natural Heritage Trust to assist fishers, aquaculturists and seafood post harvest businesses to embrace environmental sustainability through the development and implementation of environmental management systems (EMSs). 

The Seafood EMS program has been especially designed to help seafood industry people to develop and implement an EMS that meets their needs. The training component is covered in The Seafood EMS Self-assessment and Training Manual. The EMS may involve a group of seafood businesses with common interests, or it may involve only one business. Participants in the program may undertake it independently or they may work with a facilitator. Whatever the pathway, participants will gain new skills and knowledge and as this learning is shared with colleagues and workplace members it will spread throughout the seafood industry. The Seafood EMS Assessor’s Guide provides a process by which participant EMS skills and knowledge can be Recognised against national industry EMS competency standards.

The value in having knowledge and skills recognised against an external standard is appealing to more and more people in industry. With recognition comes personal satisfaction and for some, career opportunities. For the workplace it promotes a learning culture which in turn fosters further learning and sharing of knowledge. Recognition can be useful for third party audits and for meeting market protocols. For the industry, it increases the capacity for growth through expansion, improvement and marketing opportunities, and helps achieve resource security for future generations.

Guide • 10.95 MB
Seafood EMS - Communication Kit.pdf

Summary

Have you ever wished the seafood industry had a better reputation? This Seafood Communication EMS Kit can help us achieve just that.

Designed to provide you with the ‘who, what, when, where, why and how’ of communication, this guide uses the eight developmental steps for Seafood Environmental Management Systems (EMS) from the Seafood EMS Chooser to provide a framework for communication activities.

The kit is flexible so that you can decide what type of communication is best suited to your group at different stages of the EMS process.

Different groups will have people with varying levels of skill and experience in relation to event organisation, working with the media and communication in general. This means you need to assess the experience your group has with communication as soon as you start the process. Based on this assessment, you may decide to undergo some basic training (for example - learning how to work with the media).

Publication • 812.56 KB
The Seafood EMS Chooser.pdf

Summary

Our industry’s future, and access to the natural resources used by fisheries and aquaculture, will depend increasingly on our capacity to demonstrate that we are utilising these resources in a sustainable, responsible way.

More and more seafood industry businesses and organisations are setting up environmental management systems (EMSs) to improve — and demonstrate — good environmental performance. In the process, they are increasing their profits and improving their relations with the community.

An EMS can help you to gain access to the latest and best knowledge, to be innovative, and to reap the benefits of adopting the best and most efficient industry practices. Fisheries and aquaculture enterprises that want to achieve greater self-management can also use their EMS to demonstrate a standard of achievement that meets the needs of regulators within a self-managed system.

The Seafood EMS Chooser is the first step in deciding on what should be in your EMS. It provides you with an overview of what’s involved, without going into too much detail. When you have the big picture, it’s time to move on to the Seafood EMS Resources —manuals, a CD-ROM and a website — which will take you through step-by-step.

Your EMS won’t be based on a “one size fits all” model — the Seafood EMS Chooser outlines the various choices you will make to meet your goals and tailor your EMS to your unique, day-to-day business activities. Similarly, your journey along the EMS path will be far from lonely — people who have already implemented EMSs are keen to pass on their experience, and industry trainers can help you to quickly acquire EMS skills and access government training assistance.

Workshop • 2.25 MB
Seafood EMS - Worksheets.pdf

Summary

These worksheets have been prepared to assist with the creation of an EMS.
Report • 595.78 KB
Seafood EMS - Engagement of Seafood Stakeholders.pdf

Summary

The following report outlines the results of a study undertaken by Rural Solutions SA and Corvel Marketing and Management to identify the key requirements for engaging seafood stakeholders in environmental management systems for the seafood industry.

Surveys, interviews, literature reviews and focus group activities were undertaken to gauge the key factors for engagement. This guided a recommended process for ensuring successful engagement with identified tools that can be considered in future engagement processes. It is important to note here that the project team had difficulty in attaining responses from various seafood stakeholders and what is presented and used in the production of this report and the associated recommendations is taken to be representative of the seafood industry and its associated stakeholder groups.

Final Report • 2005-05-11 • 3.01 MB
2000-146-DLD.pdf

Summary

Environmental management systems in the seafood industry are gradually gaining acceptance as a means by which industry operators can pursue and demonstrate sustainable development; outcomes at the enterprise, regional and/or fishery level, and assist to build community confidence in the way that Australian fisheries resources are managed and accessed.

In response to this, the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC) funded Ocean Watch Australia Ltd (Ocean Watch) and SSA Ltd (SSA) to develop a framework and guidance material to assist industry groups and individual enterprises to adopt a systems approach to environmental management. This project was managed by Ocean Watch on behalf of the Australian Seafood Industry Council (ASIC).

The environmental management systems framework and guidance material, including the "Seafood EMS Chooser" and "Seafood EMS Step by Step Guide" were developed and refined through a case study process involving industry associations whose members participate in wild capture fisheries.

The five industry associations that formally participated in the case study process were:

  • Queensland Rock Lobster Industry Association (QLD);
  • Hawkesbury Trawl Association Inc (NSW);
  • East Gippsland Estuarine Fishers Association Inc (Vic);
  • Abalone Industry Association of South Australia (SA); and
  • South West Rocks Beach Haulers Association Inc (NSW).

Other industry groups and individual enterprises contributed in a more informal manner. The case study process was facilitated by SeaNet the environmental extension service for the Australian seafood industry administered by Ocean Watch, whose officers provided face to face assistance to participating industry associations in the form of background research and documentation of management system components. This case study process also produced examples of 'live’ EMS components, including a risk assessment, Environmental Action Plan, policy and code of conduct, providing a foundation upon which the participating industry associations can further develop and implement their management systems.

Keywords: Environmental Management Systems

National application of sustainability indicators for Australian fisheries

Project number: 2000-145
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $558,291.15
Principal Investigator: Rick Fletcher
Organisation: Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD) WA
Project start/end date: 29 Jun 2000 - 28 Dec 2008
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The urgency to develop a comprehensive and practical reporting system has increased substantially in recent years. The requirement for assessments include the need for third party Government Auditing that will result from the proposals by Environment Australia (EA) to amend schedule 4 of the Wildlife Protection (REI) Act (1982) along with the imminent introduction of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act in July 2000 and the implementation of the Oceans Policy strategies. There are also requirements within each jurisdiction to meet general government commitments to ESD and particularly when these are explicitly part of their Fisheries Legislation. Finally there are also recent developments associated with industry wanting to either gain market access or provide increased leverage for their products from gaining environmental accreditation. Thus, there are a large number of reasons why assessments need to be completed. There is an even greater need to ensure that the reporting schemes developed are sufficiently comprehensive to restrict the level of duplication.

The Standing Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture (SCFA) identified the need to actively progress the development of nationally agreed criteria and indicators that would enable fisheries managers to report against all the principles of ecologically sustainable development (ESD). The ESD objective is now explicitly or implicitly part of State and Commonwealth fisheries management legislation. There are a number of components related to ESD within the fisheries context, these include the target species, the ecosystem, social and economic issues and also management arrangements. Not all of these components are of interest or are addressed in each of the identified requirements listed above. Thus, in the assessments required by Environment Australia the only components addressed are the target species, the ecosystem and management arrangements. This is similar to the assessments required under the Marine Stewardship Council. Assessments for ISO 14000 and Codes of Conduct only cover management arrangements. However, to fully meet the commitment to ESD, all components will need to be assessed. Consequently the proposed SCFA process will cover all aspects of ESD. These comprehensive assessments should nonetheless incorporate the aspects required for these other requirements.

The SCFA Working Group has been established to steer the development of ESD criteria and indicators with the support of the SCFA Research Committee, who have developed a system for ESD reporting. The Working Group has agreed on an approach and timetable that would result in a report on the application of nationally agreed criteria and indicators for all Australian fisheries by mid 2001.

The Working Group approach includes 3 key research tasks that support their objectives, which require funding:
1. Application of draft criteria and framework using case studies
2. An SCFA workshop based around the case studies
3. An “Initial National Application” report of the ESD criteria and indicators for Australian fisheries

The urgency to progress this approach was raised at the ESD Stakeholder Workshop that was held in Geelong during March 2000. All stakeholder groups were represented at this workshop and they all recognised that there was a strong need to progress from the current situation to one where reporting on all components of ESD can be completed.

Endorsement was obtained from all sectors for the SCFA approach. There were, however, clear indications that effective consultation and participation from stakeholders were required during the project to ensure that the results will obtain national recognition and support. Consequently, a Reference Group will be established that will include representatives from Environment Australia, Commercial Fisheries, Aquaculture, Recreational fisheries, Indigenous groups, FRDC, Environmental groups and other relevant experts. The Reference Group would work in partnership with the SCFA Working Group to assist in the coordination and exchange of information. It was also suggested that this Reference Group along with selected memebrs of the SCFA Working Group could act as a resource for other relevant ESD projects (e.g. 2000/358).

Finally, the workshop resulted in the development of the appropriate linkages between the members of the SCFA proposal, which is primarily concerned with the development of effective ESD reporting mechanisms, with the proponents of the other ESD projects such as FRDC 2000/358 which is designed to assist industry develop better, more environmentally credible methods of operation. These discussions resulted in the agreement as to how the two projects can benefit each other.

Objectives

1. Facilitate the development and consistent application of practical, nationally agreed criteria and indicators by:
2. Completing a series of case studies implementing the agreed draft SCFA criteria and indicators for ESD reporting.
3. Conducting a workshop including representatives of all stakeholders to summarise the results obtained in other tasks related to the development of indicators for fisheries.
4. Completing a workshop report that contains the best available information on indicators and performance measures that could be used immediately to address the ESD criteria provided by SCFA for each main fishery type.
5. Generating a status report using an “Initial National Application” for sustainability indicators in fisheries including an evaluation section that would identify any further research, development or testing required to ensure a complete set of revised criteria, indicators and performance measures that could be used for all fisheries in all jurisdictions.
6. Complete a final national application report for Australian fisheries.
7. Initiate development of an ESD framework for cross fishery and marine planning issues.

Towards a national strategy for mud crab research - mud crab workshop

Project number: 2000-142.20
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $0.00
Principal Investigator: Chris E. Calogeras
Organisation: Department of Industry Tourism and Trade
Project start/end date: 28 Jun 1999 - 30 Jul 2001
Contact:
FRDC

Objectives

1. Provide a forum for researchers and managers to present the most up to date information on the fishery
2. Identify key management issues and identify possible research strategies to fill gaps
3. Develop FRAB proposals for consideration by individual State/Territory industries prior to the development of an FRDC proposal
4. Develop a five year research strategy for the fishery

Final report

ISBN: 07245 3061 4
Author: Chris Calogeras
Final Report • 1999-06-30 • 2.29 MB
2000-142.20-DLD.pdf

Summary

A workshop was held in Darwin, the Northern Territory (NT) in May 1999, to develop a National Strategy for Research on Mud Crab ( Scylla sp.) in Australia. Fisheries managers and researchers from Western Australia, the NT and Queensland attended, along with Industry representatives from the NT.

The workshop participants shared existing information on the fishery and biological details on the species and evaluated that data to develop a strategy for research which would seek to fill existing gaps in knowledge.

A number of specific management and research issues were identified by each jurisdiction, but there was agreement that research should focus on opportunities for collaborative work with stakeholders and government agencies which would assist in addressing the key issues identified.

This led to the development of a five-year research strategy for the fishery as outlined in Table 3. In order to maximise the benefits of available resources it was decided to adopt a phased approach to the research strategy, with complementary FRAB proposals to be prepared for consideration by individual State/Territory prior to the development of an FROG proposal.

The key areas of new research identified were:

  • Phase 1: To develop a process to estimate relative productivity of mud crab
    habitat based on satellite imagery and abundance estimation techniques;
  • Phase 2: To use validated commercial catch and effort data as an index of
    stock abundance; and
  • Phase 3: To develop a fishery independent index of stock abundance based
    on juvenile pre-recruit index.

Other outcomes arising from the above research would provide information relating to different fishery strategies and subsequent impacts on population characteristics such as sex ratios and fertilisation rates. Additionally, the information may assist in the long term goals of determining offshore migration patterns.

Support was also given to an existing project which seeks to identify, based on genetic identification, if there are discrete stocks within the mud crab population.

Methods for monitoring abundance and habitat for northern Australian mud crab Scylla serrata

Project number: 2000-142
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $576,603.94
Principal Investigator: Tracy Hay
Organisation: Department of Industry Tourism and Trade
Project start/end date: 29 Dec 2000 - 8 Sep 2005
Contact:
FRDC
SPECIES

Need

An estimate of stock size is a fundamental requirement in predicting a fishery's production potential and subsequently in developing ecologically sustainable management practices. As yet no stock estimates are available for Australian mud crab fisheries.

A number of factors make traditional stock assessment methods inappropriate for this fishery. Dr Carl Walters, in a 1996 review of the NT mud crab fishery, found that catch and effort models and assessment methods based on catch per unit effort data (CPUE) were inappropriate for assessment of this fishery due to non-randomness (hyperstability) in the spatial pattern of fishing effort. Mud crab fishers consistently fish down areas before moving to a new unfished or previously spelled area. Catch rates from this systematic local depletion process remain high, providing no evidence of stock decline. Likewise, use of traditional length-based models for estimating mortality and growth rates are problematic due to the non-continuous pattern (moult process) of crustacean growth. ( Walters 1996 FRDC Project No 96/158). Visual assessment techniques are also inappropriate due to the high turbidity of northern Australian tropical estuarine waters and fishing gear biases combined with species specific behavioral characteristics (i.e. burrowing) permits only the use of baited pots as a sampling tool. (pers. Comm. B. Hill 1999).

Recent upward trends in mud crab catch rates suggest that a degree of urgency in gaining estimates of mud crab stock size is warranted. Dr Walter's 1996 assessment results, based on the limited available data, suggested that the NT fishery was fully exploited (70-90% of available stock) and that there was little room for further development. However, in the following year the total NT mud crab catch doubled reaching 595 tonnes, with only a small increase in reported effort ( high levels of non-compliance were also reported). Qld total commercial catch has also substantially increased from approximately 400t in 1995 to 660t in 1998. Recreational and Indigenous activity trends also suggest increased activity.

Also of importance is recent work by Knuckey (1999) confirming Dr Walters conclusions that the NT Fishery (and probably Qld) heavily exploits the year one recruits. Considering the short lifespan (4 years) of this portunid crab, gaining an annual estimate of stock size is a high priority.

Anecdotal evidence from commercial fishers suggests that crab abundance follows a lunar cycle. This fine scale detail in catch variability is not evident from current logbook data and this may be a crucial factor in determining the optimal sampling period.

Given the accelerating pace of coastal development in northern Australia, identification and quantification of critical mud crab habitat is a priority for future protection of the ecosystem on which mud crab and various other stocks depend. Our ability to provide achievable biological reference points for the sustainable management of the mud crab fishery is limited by the nature of the fishing operation and the seasonal variability of catch rates.

A fishery-independent measure of stock abundance is needed to determine the size of the mud crab resource and therefore its sustainable harvest, including the potential for future development in areas such as Western Australia.

Objectives

1. Identify and quantify the area of critical mudcrab habitat in NT and QLD.
2. Develop and assess methods to estimate the size of northern Australian (NT, Qld) mud crab stocks.

Final report

ISBN: 0-7245-4721-5
Author: Tracy Hay
Final Report • 2005-07-06 • 13.50 MB
2000-142-DLD.pdf

Summary

A significant achievement of this project has been the completion of mapping of coastal wetland habitats using remote sensing techniques, which provided a complete broad-scale coverage of mud crab habitats in the NT and Qld. A major outcome/output of this work has been the incorporation of the mapping into a geographical information system (GIS) permitting a much wider application across a variety of natural resource management agencies and issues. The updated Qld maps are now available electronically to the public via the QDPI&F website CHRIS. The identification and quantification of northern Australian coastal wetland habitats will benefit a broad range of northern Australian inshore fisheries.

Survey and analysis methodologies, based on mark-recapture techniques, have been developed to estimate mud crab density for two key habitat types in northern Australia. Density estimates for each habitat type were extrapolated up across adjacent regions in each state providing the first broad scale estimates of mud crab stock size. A direct and recent output from this work has been the use of preliminary biological and fishery data, to compare trends between years for Qld and NT mud crab fisheries, during a recent fishery assessment. This fishery assessment was convened in July 2004, to investigate the reduction in commercial mud crab catch in the NT. Negotiations on adjustment to the NT management arrangements are currently in progress. 

Declines in catch and catch rate were observed in both the NT and Qld Gulf of Carpentaria (GOC) surveys over the two years of this study. This suggests large-scale environmental drivers influence mud crab recruitment success, at least for Gulf region. Estimated abundance for this region in the NT indicates a very high proportion of the legal sized mud crab stock was removed in 2003. Provision of information such as this may be far more useful for management purposes than logbook catch per unit effort (CPUE) data alone. The assessment techniques developed during this project provide a means to increase the value of CPUE data, setting up a benchmarking process that will ultimately assist in making well informed and timely management decisions.

Keywords: mud crab, abundance, habitat mapping, depletion, mark recapture, removal, trapping web

Quantification of changes in recreational catch and effort on inner Shark Bay snapper species following implementation of responsive management measures

Project number: 2000-139
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $49,125.00
Principal Investigator: Neil Sumner
Organisation: Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD) WA
Project start/end date: 5 Sep 2000 - 4 Aug 2003
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The size of the recreational catch for pink snapper together with information on the stock size from the egg production method (separate study funded by Fisheries WA) is required to estimate the proportion of the stock taken by recreational fishers over a one year period. This important information will be used to assess the sustainability of present levels of recreational fishing and to determine whether on not further management measured are required.

The Gascoyne Region Working Group has noted that a major obstacle to the resolution of fishery management and resource sharing issues in the region is the scarcity of data on recreational catches and activity. Additional monitoring beyond the previous creel survey, funded by Fisheries WA, which finished in March 1999 is required to estimate changes to the total catch, catch rates, size composition and mortality of these and other exploited marine species. This information, together with other studies funded by Fisheries WA to estimate the size of the pink snapper stocks, is required to develop strategies for the management of recreational fishing in Shark Bay.

An estimate of the recreational catch, fishing effort, catch rates and location caught for black snapper is required for the related FRDC project "The age growth and reproductive biology and stock assessment of black snapper, Lethrinus laticaudis in Shark Bay, WA" (FRDC 99/152).

Objectives

1. To estimate the proportion of pink snapper stock harvested by recreational fishers using results from this creel survey and the egg production method survey.
2. To provide an estimate of the recreational catch of all species including fish (esp. pink snapper and black snapper), sharks, crustaceans and molluscs in the Shark Bay region.
3. To provide an estimate of the recreational fishing effort in the Shark Bay region.
4. To assess the re-direction of fishing effort after changes to the management regulations.
5. To provide the length frequency of pink snapper, black snapper and other prime species kept by recreational fishers.

Final report

ISBN: 1-877098-05-1
Author: Neil Sumner
Final Report • 2003-05-05 • 1,004.14 KB
2000-139-DLD.pdf

Summary

A 12-month creel survey of recreational boat-based fishing in Shark Bay, Western Australia was conducted between May 2001 and April 2002 to estimate the catch of pink snapper.  During the survey 431 boat crews were interviewed at public boat ramps of which 414 had been fishing.

The information was required to assess the sustainability of pink snapper stocks at present levels of recreational fishing and to determine the most appropriate management measures required to keep recreational catches within management targets.

Pink snapper were predominantly caught from Freycinet Estuary and landed at Nanga (17.5 tonnes) or Tamala Station (4.7 tonnes). Pink snapper caught from Freycinet Reach were landed at Denham (7.5 tonnes). Catches from these stocks have decreased from 25.7 tonnes landed at Nanga and 12.2 tonnes landed at Denham estimated by a survey conducted in 1998-99 (Sumner et al., 2002).

The impact of revised management measures introduced in the western gulf to reduce the recreational catch of pink snapper was predicted using catch and effort data collected from surveys completed prior to their introduction. The revised management measures included a minimum size limit of 500 mm, bag limit of two, a limit of one fish over 700 mm per person and a partial closure to fishing for pink snapper in Freycinet Estuary (south of Goulet Bluff) between 15 August and 30 September during the spawning period. The predictions were found to be accurate when compared to catches estimated from a creel survey following the introduction of new regulations.

As predicted, despite the introduction of the new management measures, the estimated catch of pink snapper in Freycinet Estuary was four times the management target catch of five tonnes. In Freycinet Reach, the new management measures reduced the landed catch by one quarter with a corresponding increase in the number of undersize fish released. The effectiveness of the revised management measures varied between Freycinet Estuary and Freycinet Reach due to the different size composition of the recreational catch of pink snapper at these locations.

The limited effectiveness of the recently introduced management measures indicates that small and vulnerable stocks, such as the inner gulf pink snapper stocks in Shark Bay, cannot be effectively managed using standard techniques such as size and bag limits. Traditional recreational management methods based on size and bag limits did not reduce the catch in Freycinet Estuary to a sustainable level. Furthermore, due to the minimum size limit, large numbers of pink snapper are being caught and subsequently released particularly in the Freycinet Reach. Consequently, the mortality of fish caught and subsequently released is of concern (This is the focus of another project FRDC 2000/194 “Investigating survival of released undersized west coast reef fish”). These problems will provide challenges for the management of this and other similar recreational fisheries.

Keywords: Recreational Fishing, Pink Snapper, Shark Bay, Creel Survey

Minimising the cost of future stock monitoring, and assessment of the potential for increased yields from the oceanic snapper, Pagrus auratus, stock off Shark Bay

Project number: 2000-138
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $89,792.00
Principal Investigator: Dan Gaughan
Organisation: Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD) WA
Project start/end date: 5 Sep 2000 - 14 Apr 2005
Contact:
FRDC
SPECIES

Need

A more precise stock assessment is needed for the Shark Bay Snapper Fishery in view of the wide confidence limits around the previous assessment in the mid 1980s. Assessment is needed now because of the increased level of recreational effort on the stock and the implication in the new management plan that the commercial TAC must be reduced to enable recreational catches to be included in an overall TAC. The material is available for a precise stock assessment but resources are required for working up the data and performing the stock assessment.
Knowledge of the degree of variability in annual recruitment is required to assess the feasibility of a cost effective constant TAC management policy for the future.
Market preferences for fish of particular sizes, and the minimum legal length, can result in significant discarding. The mortality of these discarded fish and effects on the stocks need to be factored into TAC calculations.
A minimal cost method needs to be devised for routine future monitoring of the fishery.

Objectives

1. Estimate annual recruitments and fishing mortalities in the snapper fishery throughout the 1980s and 1990s.
2. Assess the risks to the snapper stock of a range of annual commercial and recreational catches, taking into account the mortality of discarded fish and variability in recruitment.
3. Devise a minimal cost method for future monitoring of the snapper fishery.

Final report

ISBN: 1-877098-69-8
Author: Dan Gaughan
Final Report • 2005-03-16 • 1.84 MB
2000-138-DLD.pdf

Summary

The investment in this project has resulted in a substantially more extensive set of age composition data than would have otherwise been possible.  This in turn has underpinned stock assessment modeling that has provided the basis for determining that the commercial fishery for snapper in Shark Bay needed a substantial decrease the total allowable catch.  The modeling was able to determine that the stock was at a low size following a period of low recruitment during the late 1990s.  The suspected low recruitment, evident once the age date were collated, and anticipated negative effects on the stock were both quantitatively described; this mathematical treatment has been a critical input to the series of management meetings for the fishery.  The significant outcome for this project was that there was no potential to increase yields in the fishery.  The fishery is considered to be sustainable since the reductions in catch were instigated.  The effort and catch levels typical of the 1990s were curtailed to allow the stock to recover – this ongoing maintenance of the fishery at a level that will allow the stock to increase in size, rather than implementing a complete closure associated with a more seriously depleted stock of snapper, is directly attributable to the research undertaken in this project.  The occurrence of infrequent but drastic recruitment failure, as demonstrated in this project, dictates that ongoing monitoring of age-composition will be required to manage this fishery.

Keywords: pink snapper, recruitment, age-structured model, cohort analysis, risk assessment.

View Filter

Species

Organisation