Identifying electronic platforms to increase safety at sea in the Australian commercial fishing fleet
Tactical Research Fund: incidence and possible causes of saddleback syndrome in the fish species of south east Queensland
The yellowfin bream is an important commercial and recreational species in Queensland, with over 400t landed annually. Anecdotal evidence suggests that the incidence of Saddleback Syndrome (SBS), a skeletal deformity primarily affecting the development of the dorsal fin spines, is increasing. This increase in the prevalence of SBS may result in recreational fishers and the public losing confidence in catching and consuming fish afflicted with the syndrome. It is, therefore, important that objective information is available to counter these concerns.
This project addresses one of the Queensland Fisheries Research Advisory Board's Research & Development priorities for 2010. Specifically, it addresses the "urgent need for research into the cause of a particular deformity of bream that is occurring in the important Moreton Bay fishery". The Queensland Fisheries Research Advisory Board (QFRAB) recently advised that a desktop study should be undertaken to determine potential causes of SBS in the international literature. Additonally, QFRAB advised that data from DEEDI's Long Term Monitoring Program should be analysed to determine the extent of SBS in Queensland.
Mr. Tony Ham, Fisheries Queensland Manager of Recreational Fisheries, has advised that SBS is an important issue, requiring attention in order to determine the incidence and cause of the syndrome in key recreational fish species.
Further, the need to investigate the cause of saddle-back deformities in yellowfin bream in SE Qld is of major importance and concern to the recreational fishing sector according to Sunfish Queensland, the recreational fishing representative group on the inshore finfish Scientific Advisory Group (SAG).
This project also addresses the concerns of commercial net fishers in Moreton Bay, specifically through the Moreton Bay Seafood Industry Association. These concerns relate to the potential difficulties in marketing bream and other species suffering from Saddleback Syndrome considering the perceived increase in the syndrome’s prevalence in recent years.
Final report
Strengthening partnerships and relationships within the recreational fishing sector
In a recently completed study (2007/058 and R4041) into strategic funding options for the recreational fishing sector, options for the national peak body, Recfish Australia, appeared limited. In the face of decreased funding from the Australian Government (a three year funding agreement ended on 30 June 2008 with no commitment to continue), the association was advised to seek alternative funding.
An option of seeking funding from the fishing trade and boating industries is currently being investigated but there are several challenges that need to be addressed before funding can be secured.
There is a need for Recfish Australia to build trust with both industry and other recreational fishing organisations not currently part of the association. A clear business case and purpose for Recfish Australia that delivers benefits to recreational fishers and industry partners needs to be formulated and the details of any funding agreement need to be carefully considered.
What is clear is that there is an ongoing need for Recfish Australia to continue as a national peak body advocating on behalf of recreational fishers and engaging with Australian Government agencies and departments. Recfish Australia provides a valuable service and ensures that the needs and rights of recreational fishers are considered in discussions of issues such as marine protected area planning, biosecurity, research and development and in strategies to deal with the implications of climate and environmental change.
Final report
Currently across Australia there are a number of formal, non-formal and ad hoc or loosely aligned industry groups representing specific sectoral interests within the recreational fishing industry.
While each group has a specific cause and unique constituency, unnecessary duplication, ineffective communication and poor lateral strategy on key policy issues affecting recreational fishing, occurs.
This project sought to identify pathways and structure that could facilitate more effective partnerships amongst peak bodies within the recreational fishing industry.
Keywords: Recreational fishing, funding, partnerships, industry, strategic.
Establishing a recreational fishing working group to develop a national implementation plan R, D and E.
Clearly it is essential that the recreational sector is well organised and structured to allow for the best use of the R, D & E resources we have and to maximise the potential but more importantly ensure the sustainability of the sector.
There is currently a lack of a coordinated national approach to R, D & E from the sector.
There is no entity or vehicle in the recreational sector to manage and procure investment for R, D & E.
There is no mechanism or event for the recreational sector that allows a regular national conference.
There is no appropriate recogntion of the achievements by the sector in the field of research, management, advocacy, volunteering, etc.
Final report
Following the success of the National Strategy for the Survival of Released Line Caught Fish it was considered that a national approach needed to be developed to address a broader range of recreational fisheries R,D&E issues.
A workshop was held in Hobart in August 2005 to determine the national priorities for recreational fisheries R,D&E and identify a suitable entity to develop a national approach. The workshop was attended by a range of key people from industry and from government.
The workshop determined that the most appropriate entity to develop a national strategy was an expanded Released Fish Survival Steering Committee and the workshop nominated a number of additional members to the Steering Committee. That expanded the range of expertise on the committee to be able to deal with the broader range of issues. That Steering Committee would be an interim one until a permanent committee could be established.
Following that workshop a number of proposals were produced for consideration by the Steering Committee. Options for the development of the national strategy were through a FRDC sub-program model or through the current Steering Committee approach. It was considered that the Steering Committee approach was the most appropriate.
At the workshop it was determined that the interim committee should be known as the Recfishing Services Steering Committee however this was later changed to Recfishing Research to better reflect its business.
Also following the workshop a Business Plan for Recfishing Research was developed that identified the significance of each priority issue, its current status and the strategic response that Recfishing Research should take in relation to each issue.
Keywords: Recfishing Research; Recfish Australia; National strategy; Research, development and extension; Research priorities.
Project products
Northern Territory strategic plan for fisheries research and development 2002 to 2006
Since its publication the Plan has provided both the Fisheries Division and the NT FRAB with a firm basis for assessing R&D proposals and R&D projects submitted for FRAB approval and support with FRDC.
However, there have been significant changes in NT Government directions and priorities since 1999 and the Plan is now becoming out-of-date. These Government policy changes include:
? Greater emphasis on recreational fishing
? Increased prominence being given to aquaculture development, both large and small scale
? Increased pressure for research on habitat and biodiversity conservation
? The requirement to report on all aspects of ESD.
As well as these government policy changes, there is also a need for stakeholders, especially from industry, to evaluate the implementation of projects, their outcomes, performance and actual achievements under the Plan.
Also since publication of the Plan FRDC has provided it's R&D Plan in the publication "Investing for Tomorrow's Fish: the FRDC's Research and Development Plan, 2000 to 2005".
The NT fisheries R&D Plan will be revised to take account of these NT policy changes, performance evaluation by stakeholders, to align it with the directions provided in the new FRDC Research and Development Plan, and to bring up-to-date projects that have been carried out since its publication.
Publication costs were kept to a minimum for the original NT Plan by the NT Fisheries Division arranging presentation, art work and printing in-house. However, in view of the higher profile that the revised document will have amongst fisheries stakeholders, a professionally designed presentation is planned for the revised version.
Final report
It was decided that the final Plan would be in two formats, the first would be publication of the full report on the NT D BIRD website and the second would be a summary version to be commercially printed. The later was in summary form to reduce printing costs.
Social and economic evaluation of NSW coastal commercial wild-catch fisheries
The contributions of commercial fisheries to coastal communities in NSW is not well understood. Current methods for estimating the economic contribution of fisheries calculate only the landed value of the catch and numbers of people directly employed in commercial fishing. This gives inadequate information about commercial fisheries’ position in economic networks within coastal communities – they require a range of goods and services provided from the local community and from larger centres in NSW, all with associated employment. A small percentage of the population is directly engaged in commercial fishing, however, existing evidence indicates that when commercial fishing declines the negative impacts may spread throughout the supply chain, as well as on the ‘glue’ holding towns together through social contributions of fishing families. In the prevailing policy environment the importance of ecological protection and the contributions of recreational fishers are well recognized, while commercial fishers are often seen as ‘the bad guys’ and bear the brunt of the trade-offs made in resource management decisions.
The project generates knowledge that can be used both to demonstrate the value of commercial industries to improve their position as stakeholders in resource management decisions, and to improve public attitudes about commercial fisheries. Sound evidence about the contributions of commercial fisheries will enable triple bottom line policies for sustainability in coastal NSW, by adding social and economic knowledge to the ecological knowledge already developed. For example, it will help identify the costs of adjustment and the resilience of communities with economically challenged fisheries, and indicate how restructuring may be made less difficult. It will also remedy the lack of understanding about contributions from particular sections of commercial fishing, such as the special contributions Indigenous commercial fishers make to their local communities - both Indigenous and non-Indigenous - related to cultural obligations.
Final report
Project products
A manual of best practice handling techniques for longline caught tuna
As mentioned, both the east and west coast longline fisheries have recently developed Codes of Practice for responsible fishing but these are generic in nature and only intended to cover the fundamentals of personal, and workplace hygiene
To date no documented process exists for best practice handling processes for tuna caught in the Australian fisheries. Implementing this process and profiling it with purchasers will contribute to consistent high quality tuna being delivered to market. This should ensure that Australian tuna is seen as a premium product and result in improved demand and value for the fishery
There is also a need for concrete initiatives to be developed which articulate and demonstrate benchmarks such as the Australian Seafood Standard in a manner consistent with the Seafood Industry Training Package. As industry moves towards outcome based standards such as these and the PPPS and FSC, there is a need for Codes of Practice and Protocols to be developed. This application will fulfill such a need.
Manual
The Australian tuna industry provides premium quality products to very particular markets. Delivering quality product to the tuna market is how we earn our living. Better quality results in higher prices. All efforts are wasted if the tuna arrive at the market place in poor condition.
When working on an Australian tuna vessel, you become part of the chain delivering these quality seafood products. The way you handle the catch from when it is hooked, to when it is landed, cleaned, chilled and stored will affect its quality. Your work in managing the deck and storage spaces of the vessel before fishing, during fishing, and after unloading can influence the quality of the product coming from your vessel. Everything you do on the deck of the boat, from cleaning to the storage of chemicals, bait, and product, has the potential to affect the quality of the catch.
Innovative Solutions for Aquaculture: potential for parasite interactions between wild and farmed kingfish, discrimination of farmed and wild fish and assessment of migratory behaviour
Seriola spp. are susceptible to a variety of viral, bacterial and parasitic diseases. In Japan, where considerable culture of these fish occurs (including S. dumerili, S. lalandi and S. quinqueradiata), several pathogens and parasites are responsible for serious production inefficiencies. Monogenean (flatworm) parasites are one of the most serious problems for the yellowtail industry and may increase production costs by over 20% (Ernst et al. 2002). In Australia, monogeneans have become a serious risk to sustainable development of the emerging kingfish industry (S. lalandi) in Spencer Gulf. Without efficient, effective and environmentally aware parasite management strategies, competitive and sustainable production will be impossible. The need for improved parasite management is recognised by industry in Australia and Japan and by the Australian Government who have jointly invested over $1 million through a 3-year Australian Research Council Linkage Project (“Kingfish/Yellowtail Parasite Management Project”) to develop integrated management strategies for the aquaculture of Seriola spp. (see Synergies below). This research project, however, has no funding to investigate the important issue of interactions between wild and cultured fish stocks. This topic is of critical concern to sea-cage aquaculture of kingfish as it has been for sea-cage aquaculture of salmonids (Anonymous 1997).
There is currently a lack of scientific information on the interactions between wild and cultured fish directly applicable to the waters of South Australia in particular, and Australia in general, on which to base sound aquatic animal health policy, licence conditions and operating standards to safeguard both the wild and cultured fish populations. There is an immediate need for research in this area to allow PIRSA Aquaculture to develop effective policy and zone management, and to provide a framework for the development of Commonwealth principles of best practice and environmental management.
Whilst Seriola spp. are considered an appropriate starting point, it is envisaged that the broad principles of policy and standards derived from the research may be applied to the marine finfish aquaculture industry as a whole in Australia. With this in mind, a three-year project is considered necessary to study the yellowtail kingfish (Seriola lalandi) sector of the marine finfish net pen aquaculture industry, specifically to investigate the population dynamics and parasite interactions of skin flukes (Benedenia seriolae) and gill flukes (Zeuxapta seriolae) on cultured and wild fish. A second requirement is to study the effects on the wild population of any escapees from culture facilities. The yellowtail kingfish sector is again an appropriate model due to the close association of the cultured and wild fish in the Spencer Gulf.
Final report
This project greatly contributed to an increased understanding of parasite fauna of yellowtail kingfish in Australian waters. This baseline information is critical to understanding potential parasite interactions between wild and farmed kingfish. Our risk assessment enables consideration of parasite species of potential threat to the emerging industry. We found batch marking hatchery fish with fluorescent dye may be the most practical and inexpensive method to discriminate wild and farmed fish. We also provide the first data on wild kingfish migrations in Spencer Gulf, demonstrating that there may be heightened interactions between wild and farmed fish in Fitzgerald Bay in summer.
This project provided training to several researchers, including one PhD student in the area of aquatic animal health and one Honours student in the area of otolith chemistry. We indicate appropriate methods to enable better management practices in the kingfish industry which will help improve the viability of kingfish aquaculture in Australia in the future.
Keywords: Seriola, aquaculture, parasites, otolith chemistry, conventional tagging programme.