537 results

Identification of natural mudworm species in South Australian Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) stocks

Project number: 2003-402
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $5,000.00
Principal Investigator: Gary Zippel
Organisation: South Australian Oyster Research Council Pty Ltd (SAORC)
Project start/end date: 29 Jun 2003 - 1 Feb 2004
Contact:
FRDC

Need

In South Australia and all other countries spionid polychaete (‘mudworm’) infestations are a major problem for oyster growers and have large financial impacts, it has been recorded by individual oyster growers to lose up to $50,000 in stock in one year. There are 150 licensed oyster growers in SA and if this loss caused by mudworm was calculated at 5% of the extreme cases at $2500 per licence holder the economic cost to industry would equate to $375,000 per annum. These losses may not be through mortality, but growers experiencing mudworm problems provide extra oysters when selling to their buyers to compensate for losses from mudworm infestations. In South Australia the species causing damage are not well known. It is for this reason that South Australian Oyster Research Council (SAORC) want to implement a survey to gain an understanding of mudworm species found in SA to assist industry with the management of this pest.

The industry views the need to understand and control mudworm infestations as the losses caused by these worms could potentially be reduced if known species are identified and management techniques can be put in place to reduce infestation rates. However, the farmer’s ad-hoc management approaches have failed to stop or reduce mudworm infestation rates, as farmers have reported that with even the best management practices they still experience mudworm infestations. Due to this, the South Australian Oyster Research Council has identified two experts in mudworm identification to work with SA scientists to survey mudworm species and suggest management practices to SA oyster growers to potentially reduce the problem. Mudworm surveys have been conducted in many other oyster growing areas and different species have been identified which have different life cycles, hence, different forms of management practices are required to reduce infestations.

If this project can achieve a 50% reduction in mudworm infestations or mortality after harmful species have been identified and farmers have implemented management techniques developed through the extension training workshop, the savings to growers will be approximately $187,500 dollars over the next year. The reduction in oyster growers production costs is a small component, the benefits will be seen in the future through increased consumer confidence, hence, increased sales of SA oysters.

In addition, minimising the impact of mudworm on the Pacific oyster aquaculture industry in SA will also strengthen the confidence of new growers and investors in this industry thereby encouraging its further development.

Objectives

1. Design and conduct a survey of spionid polychaetes (mudworm) to identify natural species and life cycle from South Australian oyster growing regions.
2. Work with SA scientist to train them in the identification of SA mudworm species.
3. Identify the best management techniques to reduce mudworm infestation rates in SA.
4. Communicate advice to farmers through a workshop format.

Final report

Author: Gary Zippel
Final Report • 2004-08-11 • 478.67 KB
2003-402-DLD.pdf

Summary

Under a joint arrangement between Seafood Services Australia (SSA) and the South Australian Oyster Research Council (SAORC), a project was developed to investigate mudworm in South Australia.

A minor mudworm survey was carried out in which between one and three dozen oysters from seven different growing areas were sampled for mudworm species, the survey involved industry members, scientists and industry experts and was implemented over a 2-day period in Adelaide. The survey only touched on the edge on the mudworm issue in South Australia, but provided a forum to train South Australian industry and scientist representatives in the sampling, preservation and the identification of mudworm.

The mudworm species identified were different from previously recorded species; which raised concerns and questions regarding the problematic species in SA.  The confusion over the identification of some of the South Australian mudworm species highlighted the need for more investigative work in this area.

Height in the water column is considered the best management method for controlling mudworm infestations on the farm; this is very much supported through the extensive research conducted by Dr Handley. Dr Handley presented on mudworm ecology and management techniques at an industry workshop held in Port Lincoln to build awareness and to reiterate to industry the potential impact mudworm can have on oyster stocks, given the right environmental conditions for growth.

The results from the survey demonstrated that future work on mudworm is required. It is SAORC aim to expand on the work done to date to identify the species causing the blisters in various SA oyster growing areas and understand enough of their life cycles to recommend effective control strategies. Then management techniques suitable to the grower can be developed, ultimately giving growers the methods to farm oysters without the financial burden of mudworm infestations.

Seafood CRC: benefit-cost analysis of marker assisted selection in Australian aquaculture species

Project number: 2008-904
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $11,135.82
Principal Investigator: Nick A. Robinson
Organisation: Flinders University
Project start/end date: 31 Jan 2009 - 29 May 2009
Contact:
FRDC

Need

The development and application of marker assisted selection (MAS), genomic breeding values (GEBVs) and selection using gene expression profiling (GEPS) is a rapidly developing area, and significant technological and methodological advances have been made in recent years. There is potential that these techniques could greatly speed the genetic progress in selective breeding programs and provide faster access and more benefit than conventional selective breeding techniques. However, before embarking on research in this area, aquaculture industries need answers to a number of questions. What basic resources are available or needed for each species before research to find markers or to apply MAS, GEBVs or GEPS can be carried out? Which traits would be best targeted for MAS, GEBVs or GEPS? and what is the economic value of these traits? What are the likely cost-benefits for MAS, GEBV or GEPS? When should research be undertaken or what developments might trigger research in this area for each species? What has been the measured impact of the application of these technologies on other industries? This project relates to the research strategies developed by the CRC from projects that have scoped selective breeding for abalone, Yellowtail Kingfish and Barramundi. It also relates to the R&D strategies developed by many of the aquaculture sectors in the CRC (eg. abalone, oyster, Atlantic Salmon, Prawns etc.) which have included in the past, or currently include, projects to develop markers or apply marker assisted selection.

Objectives

1. To provide a concise report that focuses on the relevance and benefit cost analysis of marker assisted selection for the abalone, Barramundi, Prawn, tuna, Yellowtail Kingfish, Mulloway, oyster and Atlantic Salmon aquaculture industries

Final report

ISBN: 978-0-9805789-2-8
Author: Nick Robinson
Final Report • 2009-05-01
2008-904-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project relates to the research strategies developed by the CRC from projects that have scoped selective breeding for abalone, Yellowtail Kingfish and Barramundi. There is potential that genetic marker assisted selection (MAS) techniques could greatly speed the genetic progress in these selective breeding programs and provide faster access and more benefit than conventional selective breeding techniques.

The analysis in this report addresses some of the questions raised by the use of MAS techniques in selective breeding programs for the seafood industries participating in the Australian Seafood CRC.

FRDC Resource: Development and ongoing maintenance of Australian Fish Names Standard 2019-2020

Project number: 2018-006
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $207,551.00
Principal Investigator: Alan J. Snow
Organisation: Alan Snow Konsulting
Project start/end date: 30 Jun 2019 - 29 Sep 2020
Contact:
FRDC

Need

All Australian Standards developed by FRDC will demonstrate a net benefit and therefore have an overall positive impact on Australia’s seafood industry. This means that all FRDC developed Australian Standards must provide a value or benefit that exceeds the costs to the seafood industry with associated action plans to implement continuous improvement to ensure this is met.

Public, consumer and stakeholder confidence is vital to the well-being of Australia’s seafood industry.

Australian Standards are not legal documents. However, when a government references a standard in legislation, it becomes mandatory. An Australian Standard does have status and is recognised as being a credible document. Usage of the names included in the Australian Fish Names Standard is not mandated in Australia but is listed in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code - Standard 2.2.3 - Fish and Fish Products as an advisory note (see https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2011C00569)

Standard fish names removes confusion, strengthens consumer confidence, creates market efficiencies and consistency, underpins effective fisheries monitoring and improves management of food fraud / food safety.

The use of standard fish names achieves outcomes that are consistent with the aims of industry and governments:
1 Improved monitoring and stock assessment enhances the sustainability of fisheries resources.
2 Increased consistency and efficiency in seafood marketing to improve consumer confidence and industry profitability.
3 Improved accuracy and consistency in trade descriptions enables consumers to make more informed choices when purchasing seafood and reduces the potential for misleading and deceptive conduct.
4 More efficient management of seafood related public health incidents and food safety through improved labelling and species identification reduces public health risk.

Within the next decade, the AFNS must:
• Be all inclusive including increased stakeholder awareness
• Improve the AFNS database to ensure all data is current
• Meet stakeholder expectation
• Be world’s best practice
• Be a national benchmark for sustainability
• Be part of an ongoing continuous improvement processes
• Be a transparent process to create trust

Objectives

1. Ensure FRDC maintains accreditation as a Standards Development Organisation through audits from the Standards Development Advisory Committee
2. Continue to promote and provide advice on the content and uptake of Australian Fish Names Standard and other FRDC developed standards to the broader seafood industry and government through strategic submissions and presentations to government in consultation with FRDC
3. Evaluate and implement the recommendations from the draft “Report on Stakeholder Consultation about the Australian Fish Names Standard and the Associated Processes” conducted in 2018 to ensure the AFNS continues to meet stakeholder needs and expectations
4. Continually improve the content and relevance of the Australian Fish Names Standard AS 5300 and underlying procedures to meet market, regulator and stakeholder needs and expectations.

Report

ISBN: 978-0-6450899-1-2
Author: Alan J Snow
Report • 2021-06-21 • 1.83 MB
2018-006-DLD.pdf

Summary

This project focuses on the ongoing development and maintenance of the Australian Fish Names Standard. Initiated by Seafood Services Australia in 1999, the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC) took carriage of the development of the Fish Names Standard in 2013. Initial accreditation of FRDC by Standards Australia was conducted on 11 September 2013; intellectual property of the Australian Fish Names Standard was formally transferred on 11 October 2013; and the first FRDC Fish Names Committee (FNC) was held on 12th November 2013.

This work builds on the following FRDC funded projects:
• 2012-209, “Develop and promote the Australian Fish Names Standard (AS-5300) and ensurereaccreditation as a Standards Development Organisation [Michelle Christoe, SSA Executive Officer–novated to
  (2012-209.40) Alan Snow Konsulting].
• FRDC 2012-209.40, “Develop and promote the Australian Fish Names Standard (AS-5300) andensure reaccreditation as a Standards Development Organisation” [Alan Snow Konsulting]
• FRDC 2015-210, “FRDC resource: Australian Fish Names Standard (AS-5300)” [Alan Snow Konsulting].

The operating procedures of the Fish Names Committee have continued to improve, and proposed amendments have been evaluated in a highly rigorous and professional manner.

The list of approved names in the Australian Fish Names Standard has continued to expand to meet stakeholder needs through harmonising with the Status of Australian Fish Stocks (SAFS) reports and the addition of commercially important invertebrate species.

It has been twenty years since the Fish Names process commenced through Seafood Services Australia (SSA). As such, it is an opportunity to consider what has been achieved in twenty years and what is still to be achieved.

Pharmacology and pathology of ciguatera poisoning in mammals and studies on the possible effects of ciguatoxin on fish

Project number: 1983-041
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $0.00
Principal Investigator: Mike Capra
Organisation: University of Queensland (UQ)
Project start/end date: 28 Dec 1987 - 31 Dec 1987
Contact:
FRDC

Objectives

1. To isolate ciguatoxin to obtain a more precise knowledge of the fundamental mode of action of ciguatoxin in producing the severe clinical signs that are often observed in cases of ciguatera poisoning

Final report

Author: Michael F. Capra John Cameron
Final Report • 1987-12-31 • 7.60 MB
1983-041-DLD.pdf

Summary

Ciguatera poisoning is a form of seafood poisoning that occurs in humans after the ingestion of particular specimens of a variety of tropical marine fish species. Ciguatera poisoning is caused by the ingestion of small quantities of a very powerful toxin, ciguatoxin (CTX), that occurs in the tissues of the offending fish.

The distribution of human ciguatera poisoning is confined mainly to the tropics where it is a considerable cause of morbidity. Over 50,000 people may be afflicted each year in the tropical regions of the world. It is the most frequently reported foodborne disease of a chemical nature within the USA with most cases emanating from tropical regions of southeastern Florida and Hawaii.

In the small Pacific Island nations where fish forms a considerable component of the diet, ciguatera poisoning can cause a significant public health problem. South Pacific Commission figures over the five year period 1977 to 1981 report incidences as low as 2.5/100,000 in French Polynesia. Estimates of the annual incidences of ciguatera poisoning in two Australian communities were 24/100,000 in Maryborough - Hervey Bay and 34/100,000 in Cairns.

Some of the objectives of this project were to examine the histopathological effects of CTX on non nervous tissues; to assess the effects of CTX on survival in fish; to assess the functional and structural damage to peripheral nerves in the victims of chronic CTX intoxication; and to examine the effects of CTX on excitable membranes in "carrier" and "non-carrier" species of fish.

Spatial management within the NSW Ocean Trawl Fishery

Project number: 2016-020
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $599,980.00
Principal Investigator: Matt D. Taylor
Organisation: NSW Department of Primary Industries
Project start/end date: 2 Oct 2016 - 5 Mar 2020
Contact:
FRDC

Need

As highlighted above, flooding in NSW rivers pushes a suite of important species to sea, including mature School Prawn (SP), juvenile Mulloway, and also Eastern King Prawn (EKP). Trawl fishers can enjoy good catches of large/valuable SP following these flood events (which usually occur around March), but the abundant School Prawn is frequently matched by abundant juvenile Mulloway in trawlable areas (Mulloway is overfished in NSW). In recent years, bycatch of juvenile Mulloway has led to spatial closures in the trawl fishery, which mean that inshore trawlers cannot access valuable School Prawn when productivity and demand for product are at their highest.

New South Wales has network of permanent trawling closures along the coast, many of which are present in the inshore areas adjacent to the mouths of estuaries in northern New South Wales. These closures were initiated collaboratively by DPI-Fisheries and industry to improve offshore yields of Eastern King Prawn by limiting harvest on smaller Eastern King Prawn in inshore waters. In the context of the above information, the Professional Fisherman’s Association (PFA) and DPI-Fisheries managers requested an evaluation of these permanent closures, in terms of 1) whether they afford protection for juvenile Mulloway during periods when they are flushed from the river; and 2) whether School Prawn occur in these closure areas (without Mulloway) following floods which could be exploited when other areas are closed. Consequently, managers and fishers are seeking this scientific data to 1) put bycatch levels of juvenile Mulloway into a broader context of potential impact and importance to the stock; and 2) underpin a suite of complementary management arrangements which give regard to both maintaining trawl catches and protecting juvenile Mulloway.

Objectives

1. Apply existing survey techniques to quantify the abundance and size-structure of juvenile Mulloway, School Prawn (and Eastern King Prawn), in current inshore closure and non-closure areas, under normal conditions and following floods
2. Quantify connectivity of Mulloway between key estuaries, current inshore closure and non-closure areas, and inshore and offshore trawling grounds, and the contribution of these areas to commercial and recreational landings (as a proxy for the overall stock)
3. Provide recommendations based on scientific data to inform the future management of access to inshore prawning grounds

Final report

ISBN: 978-1-76058-482-5
Authors: Matthew D. Taylor Daniel D. Johnson Darren Hale Edward V. Camp Bronwyn M. Gillanders Angela Russell Tom Barnes
Final Report • 2021-07-31 • 15.30 MB
2016-020-DLD.pdf

Summary

The NSW Department of Primary Industries-Fisheries has outlined the results of a four-year trawl survey (2017-2020) aimed at evaluating spatial management provisions within the NSW Ocean Trawl Fishery (OTF) and the potential for these to be adapted to deal with tactical challenges associated with Eastern School Prawn (Metapenaeus macleayi) harvest and Mulloway (Argyrosomus japonicus) bycatch following floods in northern NSW.  

This was the first evaluation of one of the most extensive closure networks used in a penaeid trawl fishery and highlights the unquantified impact of other inshore spatial management arrangements within NSW (e.g., Marine Protected Areas) on species that trawl fisheries interact with. 

The closure network was implemented at a time when the NSW OTF fleet was much larger. However, while not specifically intended in their implementation, the closure network provides considerable protection from fishing mortality for the broader assemblage of species which are impacted by the activities of the NSW OTF. Coupled with the fact that the closures were spearheaded by industry, this adds to the sustainability credentials for the fishery, and the social license which supports its operation. 

More information: Matt Taylor matt.taylor@dpi.nsw.gov.au 

Contribution to the organisation and publication of ASFB2004 Workshop entitled the “National Symposium on Ecosystem Research and Management of Fisheries”

Project number: 2004-303
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $15,000.00
Principal Investigator: Timothy M. Ward
Organisation: SARDI Food Safety and Innovation
Project start/end date: 29 Jun 2004 - 30 Mar 2007
Contact:
FRDC

Need

There are increasing national and international pressures to manage fisheries according to the principles of Ecologically Sustainable Development (ESD, e.g. Convention on Biological Diversity 1992; National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development 1992; Australia's Ocean's Policy 1998).

Implementing ESD for Australia’s fisheries means that research and management will need to focus increasingly on ecosystem effects. Recent assessments have shown that few data are available on the ecological effects of most fisheries.

These concepts and approaches are in the developmental stages and need to be better defined, applied and communicated.

This project meets four of the strategies within the FRDCs Natural Resources Sustainability Program:
(1) Interactions between fish and their ecosystems;
(2) Effects of fishing activities on fish and their ecosystems;
(3) Health of fish and their ecosystems; and
(4) fisheries and ecosystems management.

Funding this project would ensure FRDC involvement in this critical national initiative in fisheries research and management and extend the valuable long-term relationship between FRDC and ASFB.

Objectives

1. To conduct the ASFB2004 workshop as the "National Symposium on the Ecosystem Research and Management of Fisheries".
2. To involve international and Australian experts on: pelagic fisheries and trophodynamics
temperate reef fisheries and benthic communities
and rivers and estuaries with limited and variable flows.
3. To publish the proceedings from the Symposium in a peer-reviewed, high-quality format, perhaps as a special edition of Marine and Freshwater Research (MFR).

The development of quality standards, product specifications, and a quality management framework to facilitate market expansion for farmed barramundi

Project number: 2002-404
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $23,320.00
Principal Investigator: Graham Dalton
Organisation: Australian Barramundi Farmers Association (ABFA)
Project start/end date: 29 Jun 2002 - 28 Feb 2005
Contact:
FRDC
SPECIES

Need

The Australian farmed barramundi industry output is forecast to rise sharply over the next three years. Production will double in the next twelve months as expansion of existing operations in Queensland, and new operations in the Northern Territory, NSW, Victoria and WA, come on line. Barramundi has enjoyed relatively high market prices in the past and is considered a premium fish. It is an ideal candidate for tropical aquaculture and can be produced in saltwater and freshwater. It is now successfully grown in fresh and saltwater ponds, cages systems in marine, estuarine and in freshwater locations, in recirculation tank and pond systems, and in flow through tank systems using geothermal water. In fact barramundi is now commercially grown in every mainland State in Australia.

As the supply of barramundi increases the market price has fallen. There is a need to address this pressure on price. To date there has been very little coordinated generic marketing activity by the farmed barramundi industry. Therefore there is a real need to undertake targeted generic promotional activity based on consistent, specified quality produce. This situation is not unique to barramundi but translates across the entire aquaculture industry, particularly in other aquaculture sectors experiencing rapid growth.

In order to underpin an effective generic market development campaign the industry must address the high variability in quality of product. The high variability in quality of farmed barramundi in the market occurs for a number of reasons. Highly varying production, handling and processing techniques, a lack of understanding and expertise, a lack of willingness to address quality, and importantly, a lack of coordination across the industry. This project seeks to address each of these issues.

Objectives

1. Develop industry agreed product quality and safety standards.
2. Develop industry agreed product specifications.
3. Canvass the support for an industry specified quality label
4. Outline the quality management scheme that will enable operators to meet the requirements that support the quality label. This will need to be tailored to the various production systems used across the industry

Final report

ISBN: 0-646-44490-5
Author: Graham Dalton
Final Report • 2006-02-08 • 603.85 KB
2002-404-DLD.pdf

Summary

It has been recognised that production from the Australian farmed barramundi industry will rise sharply over the next three years. Production is likely to rise to around 4000 tonnes by 2005/06. There will be significant expansion from existing operations particularly in Queensland, Northern Territory, and WA as well as new operations in NSW and Victoria. 

The standards cover size, grading, fish condition, flavour, packing and labelling of fresh whole fish and do not cover processed fish, fillets or frozen product. They do not incorporate fish colour. 

An objective of this project was to explore the opportunities and options for the introduction of an Association label or mark that would formally identify that a member was producing products that conformed to a set of agreed standards. The label would differentiate the product from other non-accredited product. 

The ABFA determined that a label would have to be based on auditable certification and the benefits (profit) from implementing and administering a certification program would have to be worthwhile. It was considered premature to introduce an industry backed accreditation scheme to support the Standards at this point in time, however this position is to be reviewed regularly.  It was agreed that the standards should be implemented and promoted to ensure industry wide adoption.

The ABFA Executive formally agreed to adopt the quality standards and the product specifications and initiate a three-year quality program to assess and, where appropriate, implement an accreditation scheme and adopt a quality label.

Keywords: Barramundi, Quality, Standards, Aquaculture.

Diagnosis and prevention of the mid-crop mortality syndrome of pond-reared black tiger prawns (Penaeus monodon)

Project number: 1996-301
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $423,716.00
Principal Investigator: Ian Anderson
Organisation: Department of Agriculture and Fisheries EcoScience Precinct
Project start/end date: 8 Aug 1996 - 28 Nov 2003
Contact:
FRDC

Objectives

1. To refine the detection system (hybridisation and PCR) to ensure the best sensitivity and specificity for a test to detect the MCMS agent
2. To clearly identify the risk factors which aggravate the expression of clinical MCMS, including the role of blue green algae
3. To establish a model screening program which allows hatchery and farm production with virus-free prawns
4. To deterine a cost effective, environmentally sensitive disinfection program to eradicate the MCMS agent from farms and hatcheries which will be a model for future disease emergencies

Final report

ISBN: 0 7345 0145 5
Author: I.G. Anderson and L. Owens
Final Report • 2001-05-01 • 6.82 MB
1996-301-DLD.pdf

Summary

The project has created knowledge which has led to the outcome of better health management on Australian prawn farms. Changes to farm practices have occurred where whole-farm destocking and pond disinfection are applied as a hygiene practice following a season where crop declines or failures are seen. During, and subsequent to, the project prawn farmers now understand that infectious disease can affect cultured marine prawns in earthen ponds. As a consequence many farmers will submit sick prawns for diagnostic analysis soon after stressed prawns are seen in ponds, not assuming the problems are due to pond environment factors.

The project has contributed to the recovery of the Queensland prawn farm industry from the low production seen in the 1995/96 season of 1,294 tonnes (worth $28.2m) to 1855 tonnes (worth $32.4m) reported in 1998/99. A similar outcome is reflected when Australian marine prawn production is considered; from a low of 1,400 tonnes in 1994/95 to 2,059 tonnes of production in 1997/98.

The project has shown that a virus associated with Mid-Crop Mortality Syndrome is passed from breeders to their progeny. The project has created the knowledge of a detection test and that application of that test can be used by hatcheries to reduce the effect of the virus on productivity in the hatchery and farms.

People Development Program: 2009 FRDC International travel bursary - Paul Hardy-Smith

Project number: 2008-314.17
Project Status:
Completed
Budget expenditure: $6,000.00
Principal Investigator: Paul Hardy-Smith
Organisation: Panaquatic Health Solutions Pty Ltd
Project start/end date: 30 Jun 2009 - 22 Oct 2009
Contact:
FRDC

Need

Effective and practical on farm biosecurity is critical to the ongoing sustainability and profitability of aquaculture industries. Practical biosecurity is also critical for wild catch fishers harvesting aquatic species such as abalone.
There is a real need for Australia's aquatic animal veterinary expertise to maintain an up to date understanding of aquaculture biosecurity. Dr Hardy-Smith works full time with aquatic animal in Australia and provides, on a daily basis, specific biosecurity advice to clients farming or harvesting many different aquatic species in many states and the NT.
He also provides specific farm level biosecurity advice to governments.
This conference specifically addresses the issues of practical, on farm biosecurity, including the economic impact of disease and biosecurity programs . Other critical topics include:
• Components of ideal biosecurity plans and programs
• International, regional and national strategies
• Identifying and prioritizing hazardous diseases and evaluating risks
• Disease epidemiology, surveillance and monitoring
• Control and eradication contingency plans and programs
• Disease diagnostics, medical and farm record keeping
• Implementing, auditing and certifying biosecurity programs

Having Dr Hardy-Smith attend this conference addresses the needs outlined above.
There is also a need for both aquaculture farmers and wild catch fishers to keep abreast of the latest technology in the farming and capturing of aquatic species. The biosecurity conference is being held in conjunction with Aqua Nor 2009, an internationally important aquaculture industry trade show which showcases the latest in technology in fish farming. Besides such equipment as fish pumps, other technology to be presented at Aqua Nor 2009 will centre on vaccination of aquatic animals, feeding and nutrition of aquatic animals and housing/controlling of aquatic animals.
If Dr Hardy-Smith does attend the biosecurity conference, it would seem reasonable and highly beneficial for him also to attend Aqua Nor.

Objectives

1. Attendance at the International Biosecurity conference by Dr Paul Hardy-Smith
2. Attendance at Aqua Nor 2009 by Dr Paul Hardy-Smith
View Filter

Product Type

Species

Organisation